Posts

Quakers, Baptists and witches need not apply

Image
Now comes one of those difficulties in dealing with the genealogies I have access to on Family Search. While following the Morse line of Orphah Morse, the richest lineage of my possible ancestors, I came across Samuel Morse (no, not that Morse), who immigrated to America in 1635 at the age of 50.  As I searched for a historical connection I could tie to for this post, I found that he had been one of the original signers of the Dedham Covenant, which I'll discuss in just a bit. But as I began to read through the various documents posted about him and seek out confirmation of those records on the Web, I ran into the question of which Samuel Morse this might be. To make a long story short(er). posters to his entry disagree as to who Samuel's father is, though in the end they all seem to agree that Samuel Morse came to America in 1635 and is the Morse listed in the passenger manifest for the Increase, the ship he and his family sailed on. The problem is that Samuel's age listed...

An American Apostle

Image
While searching through my side of the family tree, I came upon a story for which I can find no familial ties. But because these little missives are supposed to include history that doesn't have to include an ancestor, I've decided to tell it this week. And it's a good story. John Eliot came to Boston in the Massachusetts colony in 1631 to pastor a Puritan (aka Congregational) Church. After a year, he moved to nearby Roxbury and began a church there. He would serve as the church's pastor until his death 58 years later.  Almost immediately he established relationships with members of the Narragansett tribe, and as time went on, with other tribes of the Algonquin language group. He took the time to learn their language and ministered in their midst at the same time as caring for his English church. The English settlers had rocky relations with the tribes. Many thought of the indigenes as a nuisance, in the way of God's will for their ownership and domination of the la...

Survivor

Image
I wrote previously about John Howland, who may be an ancestor of mine (see Hanging by a thread, er, rope , June 24, 2022). For those who don't remember -- and who would? -- Howland survived falling overboard on the Mayflower, surviving only because in the storm that caused his misfortune, some lines had come loose and were hanging over the side. He managed to grab one of those and hang on until he was rescued.  He would later marry a woman named Elizabeth Tilley, who also turns out to be one of my ancestors not just because of her marriage, but because her parents were on board and show to be in my direct lineage. John and Joan Tilley left England on the Mayflower with their youngest daughter to come to the new land for the same reason most of the other passengers did -- they belonged to the dissenting group known to us as Pilgrims and sought freedom to practice their version of Christianity outside of the constraints of the Church of England. The other children had reached majorit...

A family scandal -- or was it?

Image
After all the wonderful connections I found on Sharon's side of the family with famous incidents in English history, I decided it was time to jump to my side of the tree and see if I could come up with some illustrious person or persons I could talk about.  As I've mentioned before, the most fruitful source of stories on my side has been through the lineage of my third great-grandmother, Orpha Morse, my grandmother's great-grandmother. I have links to English peerage through her and have occasionally found the odd good story.  For this post I started tracing back through a previously unexplored ancestral line, failing to find any interesting stories until I hit upon my 10th great-grandfather William Mead. I seem to be temporarily stuck on 10th great-grandfathers. Not much information exists about William. The notes attached to his record state that several genealogists have invested some effort into discovering the details of William's life, only to come up short.  One ...

The queen's doctor: The Roderigo Lopez affair

Image
Sir William Wade (Waad in older English spelling) worked most of his life in the employ of  Queen Elizabeth I's and King James I's governments. Among his roles, we discovered last time, was that of spy, and as we learned a few posts back, he also served as lieutenant of the Tower of London. His service in this last role brought about the execution of one of England's most infamous conspirators, Guy Fawkes. Because he served as a member of Parliament in the House of Commons, he earned an entry in the massive History of Parliament, which has its own website if you're curious. His role in Fawkes' death and his time are among the many items listed in this brief biography, which also mentions that he "played a significant role in failing the Babington and Lopez plots." Unfortunately, the History  maddeningly fails to provide any details about Wade's involvement nor does any of the sources I consulted while researching the plots he's connected with. What...

Like James Bond, only without the cars and toys

Image
We return to another of Sharon's 10th great-grandfathers, Sir William Waad, or Wade, in contemporary spelling. Wade, you will remember, had been appointed  lieutenant of the Tower of London and is credited with being the one to interrogate Guy Fawkes after the attempted bombing of Parliament.  This all took place near the end of his career in government, but he held other positions, including member of Parliament, diplomat and ... spy. Now if you look at the English historical websites, you won't see that listed as a formal job description. Instead, you will see that he worked as an agent for 1st Lord Burghley, aka Sir William Cecil, whom we have encountered before, on whose behalf he traveled to a variety of European destinations over several years. He developed relationships with a variety of folks who could supply him with information about their countries of residence, information he forwarded on to Cecil.  Now, of course you could argue that he may have acting in a b...

Of demons and witches

Image
James I had more impact on religion than commissioning the Bible that bears his name. Turns out, a few years earlier he wrote a book on demons, and one of England's longest lasting acts prohibiting witchcraft was passed early in his rule. I ran across this information while researching Sharon's side of the tree, and although I don't believe any of them had anything to with the legislation beyond voting on it, I thought I'd post about it before moving on to one of her relatives who's already been mentioned in connection with Guy Fawkes. Coincidentally he served on a couple of the same committees Sir John Hungerford served on, so they would have known each other. James' book on demons, aptly titled Demonology, appeared in 1597 in Scotland and was republished in England in 1603, when he assumed the throne there. Some scholars believe the book influenced Shakespeare's MacBeth, which dates to 1623. Others theorize Will might have been making some sort of subtle p...